The Sinker Mentality: Where, What, When, Why, and How

We may hold differing political views but when the perspectives are to the polar opposites of freedom and oppression entering the middle ground, by either side, will be giving way to the other extreme. Getting one side to enter that middle ground can initiate its demise. Compromise in Washington D.C. has long meant conservatives giving up on their principles. That is because the liberal-minded, dogmatically look unfavorably upon compromise. By and large, any compromise from the left has been a throw-away issue or something that was easily regained at a later date. The destructive nature of the far left is never volunteered for compromise and in recent years (since the late 1980s), we’ve seen the Democrat party increasingly turn toward the far left. When someone is intent on undermining freedom you can hardly afford to compromise with them. We must educate their supporters to change their allegiance from, “something-for-nothing,” (which does not work), to, “something-for-something,” (i.e. self-awareness, self-dependence, and self-realization).

Viewing American history over the last 100 years we can see the slow creep of a despotism which has come to full-flower in the ObamaCare attempt to corral the population into a repressive structure where life and liberty will be decided upon by a bureaucratic board. But ObamaCare is only the resurfacing of HillaryCare. Remember that? HillaryCare strove to tell people who their doctor was going to be; how the doctors would practice medicine and even where they would practice. What this group seeks is control, pure and simple. How do we discuss ideas with those possessed of an irrational mindset? Destroying the freedoms of America is nothing short of irrational and should not be compromised with. This is the middle ground that will embolden the destructive to their ultimate goal. The reader may wonder what that goal is and could it actually be as destructive as some think. To understand this mindset is to uncover the depths of depravity that is accessible to human nature.

There will not be compromise by the practitioners seeking the destruction of American liberty. Many of those thoughtful, caring, and helpful among us do not want to believe we are in a world war with the purveyors of oppression. But we are. We are not talking about the difference between painting a bridge yellow or painting it green. We are talking about the difference between allowing the bully tactics of “card check” and the supporting of the American tradition of a secret ballot. In the middle of this difference is a population that wants to be left along to pursue their own happenstance (read “happiness”), which is confronted by a mindset determined to punish success, create hopelessness, and placate emotional distress in order to subjugate the helpless. I know these may be viewed as “wild” accusations but the testimony of anti-Amercianism abounds.

The cultivation of disdain for freedom knows not nationality or generational persuasion. The gnawing desire to control others is found deep inside the insecurities of those individuals unwilling or incapable of accepting that people, circumstances, and choices vary widely in life. These are the people who judge others needlessly for decisions that have no impact upon them, other than they are made to “feel” uncomfortable and are unable to dispatch the notion of those inconsequential behaviors. This is the root of the motivation that influences those who seek control over others (and rarely at a cost to themselves). Some may say that their actions are instead a search for wealth or spiritual purity. I contend that money and piety are obsolete when the iron-fisted ruler has control. And the iron fist, as it has been throughout history, is what is pursued here, at this time, and against every core principle of America.

As a point of discussion we ought to make a distinction between “power” and “control.” The righteousness denoted in the word, “power,” ought not be given to a destructive and malignant mindset that has insidiously wheedled its way into the schools, media, sciences, and governing bodies of the greatest nation ever to be founded upon this planet with its goal of subjugation and its wreaking of hopelessness. No, this mindset is intent on its highest possible station of controlling the population for its obsession of rendering humankind confined, impotent, and unfulfilled. (Control is what is sought when righteous power is impossible to obtain.) They will find themselves failures though the needless suffering in the interim must be made as brief as possible. To this end thoughtful Americans, and indeed thoughtful people around the world, are joining their voices to end this tyrannical venture.

What may we call this behavior and how do we identify it?

I have coined a dichotomy to express this polarity found in human nature, it is, “Thinkers and Sinkers.” The ancients that first discussed the prospects of humanity governing itself, who postulated Divinity, and who gave rise to philosophical reasonings of the human condition are our exuberant benefactors and oft sighted, “Thinkers.” Those who struggle in the River of Life and who flail and panic, clutching for support from the nearest object (read persons), for rescue, both materially and emotionally, are the shame-ridden, “Sinkers.” To this day every person is capable of becoming more completely either of these forms. When the Sinker successfully shouts down the Thinker, as they gain support from the thoughtless, and as they implement their scheme to alleviate their self-perceived shortcomings we find society in the grips of unbridled destruction. In the past, the Thinker adversaries were less of a threat to the oppressive. Hence the Sinker reaction, while still brutal, was less frenzied or fatalistic. With the emergence of the United States of America and the notion of individual sovereignty a whole new level of threat to the Sinker mindset became manifest. This was the lighting of a slow burning fuse that has set the stage for a global, and imminent, explosion. So now we have a name for those exhibiting the behavior…”Sinkers.” Now one might ask, “How can even the least-engaged identify these Sinkers?”

The primary action at the crux of the Sinker mindset is judgment. Judgment is an action that is easy to evidence. From the trifling subterfuge of gossip and specious assertions, to the endless spewing of venomous hatred, there are a multitude of opportunities for self aggrandizement so vital to this course of action. This is an enticing yet corrosive behavior. Enticing because it feeds a base instinct to secure one’s own superiority by demeaning another. Corrosive because it is dehumanizing of the actor, stripping away their humility. The identifying markings of the judgmental are some times hard for them to hide, though the more adapt have fooled the public for decades. Part of this obfuscation is made complete by the less-active investigation of these personalities. But because we are all human we all possess the potential to be judgmental. To be the best we can, we must recognize that in ourselves we each are susceptible to proffer thoughtless and base behavior. Beyond injuring ourselves we model inspiration to others, inducing like behavior. This can possibly seal our downward fate.

But because we are descendants of those original Thinkers we have them in our DNA. Regardless of where any of us have come from the soul of humankind is connected to the Divinity capable of uplifting our spirit and providing for the triumph over the arrogant, angry, and crude Sinker mentality. For us to fully surmount this challenge we must educate and cultivate ourselves. To overcome the Sinker mindset we need to instill, in our hearts, the acceptance and/or neutrality toward non-threatening traditions and perspectives of our fellow human. If we do this we will inspire those who are less inclined toward thoughtless behavior and with a small conversion of borderline Sinkers to borderline Thinkers we can marginalize this insipid and destructive nature. To advance this education I have dissected this thesis of, “Thinkers and Sinkers,” in a newly published book that makes the argument of where it comes from, what it seeks, and how to defuse it.

I hope this article will peak interest in the reader to explore this offering more fully. All the information and social networking is available at: The ISBN for the book is 9780615450407. An inexpensive pdf download is also available.

I most wholeheartedly appreciate your indulgence and look forward to your thoughts.

Thank you,
Dave Moore


Of the Complex and the Simple by Davida Patrick Moore

Everything in life is spiritual. What that means is everything is definable within a corresponding emotion, for the observer, that has some semblance of meaning however fleeting or profound. This is the foundation for this experience we call life. Every thought and action, and this includes emotion, is in reaction to some prior event. All things are connected in this string of events. And while we feel and otherwise sense this life, those feelings are all founded on an individual’s perception of the events. This is how two observes, side-by-side, seeing a single event, can produce two separate experiences.

How this carries forward into the world as a whole is constant. We witness the events of this world yet as a reaction we have only three choices in response. Those choices are encapsulated in a concept I call, “The Power To Love.” In The Power To Love our choices to the events, circumstances, and people we encounter are, “I love it,” “I hate it,” and “Whatever.” The, “Whatever,” is a true neutral, lack of concern. This is important to recognize. A sarcastic, “Whatever,” is actually hate. Hate can be described as judgment. Judgment is a determination that no one should engage is such a behavior or activity. Short of civil law judgment is self-destructive. The most powerful of these choices is, “I love it.” Here we re-enforce ideals or activities that resonates with our heart. From this choice we can build an uplifting future for ourselves, our community, and the world. The simplicity of, “The Power To Love,” is indicative of the nature of the universe. Even within the seeming complexity of natural phenomena the elegance of a simplistic design can be found.

A 14th century, Franciscan friar, William of Ockham discovered a principle that he later described as, “the law of briefness.” In this principle, named, “Occam’s Razor,” he stated that the simplest explanation was most often the correct explanation. With this in mind consider these simple offerings; nothing has any meaning for an individual until they decide what it means to them; what they decide will reflect their character, their heart, and their enculturation; everything has purpose; in every situation an uplifting experience can be found. These axioms are only the beginning of communication from a greater consciousness to the finite mind of humanity and our ability to understand this world. Our inability to relax and our tendency to seek more complicated explanations for the events of this world lead to our being more easily manipulated. There may be a part of the human psyche that wants, or even needs, this world and our experience to be complex. I personally do not believe this is what an all-knowing, all-powerful, and ever-present consciousness would devise into which it would drop a finite and often challenged species such as humanity.

So we are left to wonder why do we have to make things more complicated than they truly are? And to ask, “What is the alternative?”

If supported actions are physically destructive to the group or abusive of the innocent those actions, for the good of all, must be displaced. What constitutes these actions can encounter a, “fine line,” when it comes to a society determining, “common good.” The fine line that separates the individual’s actions and self-destructive influences that are accepted and acted upon by others is found, or lost, in quality of education or enculturation. The time-honored parental adage, “If your friends were jumping off a bridge, would you do it?” comes to mind. The less educated or poorly cultured might very well engage in the the less-desirable behavior that is giving the parent reason to pause. The confusion felt by the poorly educated or uncultured is propelled by another sense that is bred into all humans, herd instinct. Without the sufficient thought given to questionable scenarios a thoughtless reaction can easily kick in to generate the required response. Here the present day manipulation of the herd can produce behavior desired by the herd masters. Today those herd masters are found in Pop Culture, the media, political agendas, and other groups including; churches, schools, and social structures such as gangs and even virtual zeitgeist. What motivates these sources of influence, and the suggestions they make, ought to be the subject of the greatest scrutiny.

There was an anti-drug advocate that was mercilessly ridiculed when they suggested, off-the-cuff, that the way to stay off drug is to, “Just say no.” Life doesn’t get much simpler than that. This, “silver bullet,” approach to remaining drug free is as elegant as it is deadly to those influences that wanted more and younger people to become drug addicts. The suggestion that simply saying, “no,” to drugs was naive was another way of keeping to possibility of using drugs in front of those faced by the scourge. The endless haranguing and irrationality to explain saying, “no,” as being useless was an over-complicated and actually destructive attempt to dismantle the simple and effective response to the pitfalls of drug use. So who wants people to become drug addicts? To learn that fact you’ll need to study, “Thinkers and Sinkers, Why Are They Trying To Kill You?” (ISBN 9870615450407). Because these are the same people who are trying to reduce your ability to make good on your rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

To get started please visit: Thank you, Davida Patrick Moore